GCP, ICH E6(R3) and the Regulators

Part of Clinical Research Associate (CRA) Training: Foundations for the Monitor.

About 6 minutes. Free, in your language, no account needed.

Why this matters

A monitor is asked "where does that requirement come from?" more than anyone else on a trial. Answer it wrongly and you either impose work that is not required or you miss something that is.

This lesson gives you the layers and the current version of the standard.

Good Clinical Practice

Good Clinical Practice, or GCP, is the international standard for designing, conducting, recording and reporting clinical trials involving people. It has two stated purposes, in this order: protecting the rights, safety and wellbeing of participants, and making the results reliable.

It is written by the International Council for Harmonisation, or ICH. The guideline is E6.

ICH was founded in April 1990 as the International Conference on Harmonization, and was renamed the International Council for Harmonization in 2015 when it became a legal entity under Swiss law. Material still saying "Conference" is out of date by a decade.

ICH E6(R3) is current

E6(R3) is the operative revision. R2 is history and should only ever be described as such.

R3 has a different shape from R2. It is built from a set of overarching Principles, organized into eleven categories, followed by Annexes. Annex 1 covers interventional trials and is where nearly all of your work sits. Do not quote a count of the individual sub-points beneath the categories; sources count them differently and the number proves nothing.

Two changes matter to monitors directly. R3 contains an explicit treatment of data governance, shared between investigator and sponsor. And "essential documents" became "essential records", because records now expressly include data and relevant metadata such as audit trails.

Guideline, law, contract, protocol

Four layers govern what a site must do. Know which one you are quoting.

LayerWhat it isExample
ICH guidelineAn internationally harmonized standardE6(R3), adopted 6 January 2025
Regional or national lawEnforceable where the site is21 CFR Part 50; Regulation (EU) No 536/2014
The clinical trial agreementA contract between sponsor and siteData entry within five working days
The protocolThe rules for this trialSerious adverse event report within 24 hours; visit windows

An ICH guideline is not law. It becomes enforceable only when a regulator adopts it into its own framework. This is why requirements differ between countries, and why "ICH requires it" is often the wrong answer.

The regulators

United States Food and Drug Administration. Its rules most relevant to sites include 21 CFR Part 50 on informed consent, Part 56 on institutional review boards, Part 312 on investigational new drug applications, Part 812 on investigational device exemptions, and Part 11 on electronic records and signatures.

European Union. Trials are governed by Regulation (EU) No 536/2014, the Clinical Trials Regulation, applicable since 31 January 2022, replacing the earlier Directive. Applications go through a single EU portal.

Other national authorities include the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency in the United Kingdom, Health Canada, the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency in Japan, and national agencies across Africa, Asia and Latin America.

Data protection law applies on top: the General Data Protection Regulation in the European Union since 25 May 2018, HIPAA in the United States, and national equivalents elsewhere, some of which restrict transferring health data abroad.

Three corrections worth carrying

These are widely taught wrongly, and a monitor who repeats them loses credibility fast.

ICH E6(R3) never uses the acronym ALCOA. It states the data attributes directly, in words. Its glossary definition of data integrity lists eight: attributable, legible, contemporaneous, original, accurate, complete, secure and reliable. Use ALCOA as a memory aid if you like; never attribute it to the guideline.

E6(R3) states no record retention period in years. Section 3.16.3 defers to applicable regulatory requirements and requires the sponsor to inform the site in writing. Figures like 2, 15 or 25 years come from regional law or from the contract.

E6(R3) gives no number of hours for serious adverse event reporting. Section 2.7.2(b) says immediately after the investigator reasonably becomes aware. The familiar 24 hours is a protocol convention; 7-day and 15-day expedited clocks are regional regulation.

In practice

At one of Leah's VT-301 sites, a coordinator says her previous monitor told her that ICH requires GCP retraining every two years and that all records must be kept for fifteen years.

Leah checks rather than agreeing. Neither statement is in ICH E6(R3). The two-year retraining interval is the sponsor's own policy for this trial, and she can show the coordinator where it is written. The retention requirement comes from the sponsor's written retention instruction, which is in the site file and which for this trial says something different from fifteen years.

The coordinator's practice does not change. Her understanding does, and so does what she will tell an inspector when asked why the site does it.

Knowing which layer a rule comes from is the difference between compliance and folklore.

Key takeaways