The History and Evolution of Good Clinical Practice

Part of Good Clinical Practice (GCP) — ICH E6(R3): Introduction to Clinical Research and GCP.

About 5 minutes. Free, in your language, no account needed.

Why this matters

Good Clinical Practice (GCP) is not an abstract standard. Almost every rule in it was written after people were harmed. If you know why a rule exists, you apply it correctly under pressure. You also avoid a common site problem: staff trained on an old version who quote requirements that have changed.

The ethical foundations

Modern research ethics grew from a series of public failures and the responses to them.

YearEventWhat it established
1947Nuremberg CodeVoluntary consent of the human subject is essential.
1964Declaration of Helsinki, adopted by the World Medical AssociationEthical principles for medical research involving human subjects.
1966Henry Beecher publishes "Ethics and Clinical Research"Showed that unethical studies were common in mainstream medicine.
1972The Tuskegee syphilis study is publicly exposed and stoppedForced national reform of human subject protection in the United States.
1974United States National Research Act, signed 12 July 1974Created the National Commission that later wrote the Belmont Report.
1979Belmont Report publishedRespect for persons, beneficence, justice.
1991Common Rule (45 CFR 46 Subpart A)A single federal policy for human subject protection in the United States.

The Declaration of Helsinki remains the ethical source that GCP names directly. Principle 1 of ICH E6(R3) states that clinical trials should be conducted "in accordance with the ethical principles that have their origin in the Declaration of Helsinki".

The harmonization era

By the late 1980s, sponsors were repeating the same trials to satisfy different national regulators. This wasted time and exposed more participants than necessary.

The move to E6(R3)

E6(R3) is the operative revision. E6(R2) is historical.

What actually changed in the structure

R2 was one flat document with numbered sections 1 to 8. R3 has a different shape. It is built from a short set of overarching Principles, followed by Annexes that explain how to apply those Principles to particular kinds of trial. Annex 1 covers interventional trials. Annex 2 covers decentralized and pragmatic elements and real-world data.

Three other changes matter at site level. R3 adds a whole new section on data governance, shared between investigator and sponsor. R3 replaces the term "essential documents" with "essential records", because records now include data and metadata. R3 folds the contract research organization into the broader idea of a "service provider".

In practice

Dr. Sarah is a primary care physician. She has been made principal investigator for an ABC Pharmaceuticals hypertension trial. Her coordinator, Ana, finds GCP certificates in the staff files from 2019. The certificates describe "the 13 principles of ICH GCP".

Ana is right to question them. Thirteen flat principles is an E6(R2) description. E6(R3) organizes the principles into 11 categories. The certificates are not fraudulent, but they document training on a superseded revision. Ana raises this with Dr. Sarah, records the gap, and arranges E6(R3) training for all delegated staff before the site initiation visit. She keeps the old certificates in the file. She does not destroy them, because they show what training the staff had at the time.

Every GCP rule exists because someone was harmed without one.

Key takeaways